<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>mmnotes</title>
	<link>http://notes.boutotcom.com</link>
	<description>Notes on media machina</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:14:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.2.1" -->

	<item>
		<title>Notes: Analysis Of The Context Changes: Transition</title>
		<description><![CDATA[This analysis has been done a few years ago but it&#8217;s still relevant: it lays down basic, simple observations that a lot of media are still battling against rather than using them to their advantage: # we have to find ways of using the influx of readers&#8217; messages we have to find ways of hosting [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://notes.boutotcom.com/2009/10/28/analysis-of-the-context-changes-transition/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Notes: Why I Am Not Worried About Journalism</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The people named in the list have common characteristics: they post content regularly on the Web (but not too much); they do journalism, whether they are journalists and/or have other crafts; they are better than good; they are creators; they are driven; they are fun to read. # Please read What does &#8220;beta&#8221; mean? here [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://notes.boutotcom.com/2009/10/07/notes-why-i-am-not-worried-about-journalism/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Notes: McLuhan and the Machine</title>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;&#8230;professor of English literature and literary critic&#8221; from Wikipedia # I must say that I have not half of McLuhan prodigious cultural knowledge and I don&#8217;t get a significant part of his literary references. So I am not venturing on this terrain. Furthermore, McLuhan was mainly a man of the spoken word rather than a [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://notes.boutotcom.com/2009/10/06/notes-mcluhan/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

